(here comes a serieus reply

)
Morpheous wrote:My Gigabyte supports Dual BIOS, Dual PSU and comes with dynamic overclocking, and outperforms Asus models in the same price range. Ha!

Dual Bios? You mean you have a backup bios and they wrote it down under a different name, you can't have two bios'es running at the exact same time.
This is not really special and is actualy implemented in some way in about every board of the last 5 years, only with most there is just the option to restore the bios by means of a special 3rd cmos jumper option, instead of running on the backup to restore the primary.
Dual PSU... *coughs* Power Supply Unit... Why in gods name would you want to connect TWO power supply units??
Dynamic Overclocking? Thats just a way of saying... we made overclocking easy for you, however the way we do it will be sucky, but we don't want you to know that offcourse, nor do we want you to know that we limited the actual overclocking and removed the dip switches for you so you won't do it the way its supposed to
Not trying to flame your morpheus, but about 90% of what it says per mainboard is crap, just tricks for you to choose that exact board.
I cannot tell which of the boards mentioned here is better, I can say something about the chips used... but though some chips are less stable than others, they all have both positive and negative sides, and the outcome offcourse depends for a large part of what parts the board manufactor actualy decided to use on your board and what functionality to disable and point to other chips.
mainboards speed basicly just depends on a few things, for one, the front side bus, memory is better if its closer to the cpu(amount doesn't matter anymore, but offcourse memory speed, latency, etc still does highly... but thats usualy more up to the mem module than the mainboard, except for supported max speed that is) and then the question is what onboard functions are you using... and the miljon dollar question always is... what north bridge does it have? (which is 9 out of 10 times the one reason that makes the board stable, or instable).
Extended ATX is last on my list.. its only difference with normal ATX is that the size can be just a little bigger, usualy these boards are server related and have multiple PCI-X (note... not PCI express) slots for which I still have to find a senseble useness :roll:
Looking at the pics of killer the upper board is inferiour in more than just the slots.
Many of its functions (chips) now seem to have been moved to a single chip (bad because it usualy affects much of the quality of the work the chip does)
No extra ATA Raid 0 slot?
Badly removed PCI slot... should've removed the top one and kept the buttom one.
Missing 2 backpannel USB ports.
I hope for you kill that it has some significant technology updates... like replace your agp 4x with agp 8x, and use I2S codec for audio output instead of AC'97, have onboard sex machine.. or something anywayz :s
As my personal preference... if I go for quality I buy soltek, if I go for speed I usualy go for asus because of a larger and quicker (to increase/upgrade) productbase.
If I go for both (my own pc usualy) I spend a good month on researching various board from all brands all over the world
